🔗 Share this article

The celebrated author Jilly Cooper, who passed away unexpectedly at the 88 years old, racked up sales of 11 million books of her various grand books over her 50-year career in writing. Beloved by all discerning readers over a particular age (forty-five), she was presented to a new generation last year with the TV adaptation of Rivals.

Cooper's Fictional Universe

Longtime readers would have preferred to view the Rutshire chronicles in sequence: commencing with Riders, first published in 1985, in which the infamous Rupert Campbell-Black, scoundrel, charmer, rider, is debuts. But that’s a sidebar – what was notable about viewing Rivals as a box set was how brilliantly Cooper’s universe had aged. The chronicles captured the 80s: the shoulder pads and voluminous skirts; the obsession with class; the upper class disdaining the Technicolored nouveau riche, both overlooking everyone else while they quibbled about how warm their champagne was; the intimate power struggles, with inappropriate behavior and misconduct so commonplace they were virtually characters in their own right, a double act you could count on to drive the narrative forward.

While Cooper might have occupied this era fully, she was never the proverbial fish not perceiving the ocean because it’s ubiquitous. She had a compassion and an perceptive wisdom that you might not expect from hearing her talk. Every character, from the pet to the pony to her mother and father to her French exchange’s brother, was always “utterly charming” – unless, that is, they were “completely exquisite”. People got assaulted and more in Cooper’s work, but that was never condoned – it’s surprising how OK it is in many more highbrow books of the era.

Background and Behavior

She was well-to-do, which for practical purposes meant that her father had to earn an income, but she’d have characterized the social classes more by their mores. The bourgeoisie fretted about all things, all the time – what society might think, mainly – and the elite didn’t care a … well “stuff”. She was spicy, at times incredibly so, but her prose was never vulgar.

She’d recount her upbringing in fairytale terms: “Father went to Dunkirk and Mother was deeply concerned”. They were both completely gorgeous, engaged in a enduring romance, and this Cooper replicated in her own union, to a businessman of war books, Leo Cooper. She was 24, he was twenty-seven, the union wasn’t smooth sailing (he was a unfaithful type), but she was never less than at ease giving people the secret for a blissful partnership, which is creaking bed springs but (key insight), they’re creaking with all the joy. He didn't read her books – he tried Prudence once, when he had influenza, and said it made him feel more ill. She wasn't bothered, and said it was reciprocated: she wouldn’t be seen dead reading war chronicles.

Always keep a journal – it’s very challenging, when you’re twenty-five, to recall what being 24 felt like

Early Works

Prudence (the late 70s) was the fifth volume in the Romance novels, which began with Emily in 1975. If you discovered Cooper in reverse, having started in the main series, the initial books, also known as “the novels named after posh girls” – also Bella and Harriet – were close but no cigar, every male lead feeling like a trial version for Rupert, every main character a little bit drippy. Plus, page for page (I can't verify statistically), there wasn't the same quantity of sex in them. They were a bit conservative on matters of modesty, women always being anxious that men would think they’re loose, men saying outrageous statements about why they favored virgins (comparably, seemingly, as a real man always wants to be the primary to unseal a container of coffee). I don’t know if I’d suggest reading these books at a impressionable age. I thought for a while that that’s what the upper class really thought.

They were, however, extremely tightly written, successful romances, which is far more difficult than it sounds. You lived Harriet’s surprise baby, Bella’s pissy relatives, Emily’s remote Scottish life – Cooper could take you from an hopeless moment to a windfall of the heart, and you could not once, even in the initial stages, pinpoint how she did it. At one moment you’d be smiling at her highly specific depictions of the bedding, the following moment you’d have tears in your eyes and little understanding how they appeared.

Literary Guidance

Inquired how to be a novelist, Cooper frequently advised the sort of advice that the famous author would have said, if he could have been inclined to guide a beginner: employ all five of your faculties, say how things smelled and seemed and audible and tactile and palatable – it significantly enhances the prose. But likely more helpful was: “Constantly keep a notebook – it’s very difficult, when you’re 25, to remember what being 24 felt like.” That’s one of the primary realizations you observe, in the more detailed, character-rich books, which have numerous female leads rather than just a single protagonist, all with very upper-class names, unless they’re Stateside, in which case they’re called a simple moniker. Even an years apart of four years, between two relatives, between a man and a woman, you can perceive in the conversation.

The Lost Manuscript

The historical account of Riders was so perfectly characteristically Cooper it might not have been true, except it certainly was factual because London’s Evening Standard made a public request about it at the period: she wrote the whole manuscript in the early 70s, well before the first books, brought it into the city center and left it on a bus. Some context has been deliberately left out of this story – what, for instance, was so crucial in the city that you would forget the sole version of your book on a train, which is not that far from abandoning your infant on a transport? Certainly an rendezvous, but what sort?

Cooper was prone to amp up her own disorder and haplessness