🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are more and more allowing the radical right to set the public discourse, as per a recent research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers discovered that this trend has unwittingly helped radical groups by validating their viewpoints and spreading them to a broader audience.

Study Based on Two Decades of Media Coverage

The findings, released in the European Journal of Political Research, relied on an computerized content review of over 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen German publications.

Capital-based scholars noted that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to central subjects like assimilation and migration, established political groups increasingly adapted their messaging in response.

This adaptation amplified the dissemination of these concepts and signaled to voters that such stances were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Political communication by established parties plays a central role in the voting performance of the radical right," explained a political sociologist involved in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she added.

The effect was evident even when mainstream groups were criticising the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the expert commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is crucial."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the study was centered around the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to apply to nations across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," explained another co-author. "Radical groups says something and everyone starts talking about it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he added.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At certain points, leaders have also hardened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recent interview, a former national leader called for widespread expulsions and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable examples can be found across the continent, as elected officials from countries ranging from the United Kingdom to France embrace the language of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that would have been inconceivable a decade ago.

Core Problem: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are talking about cultural issues – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the far right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," explained a study author.

Other parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the hardline platform of the radical right, even as studies indicates that this approach drives voters to vote for the radical faction.

Progressive Impact and Voter Awareness

The scope of data collected showed that the impact of far-right groups had been gradual and had grown over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," stated a researcher. "But if you encounter this pessimistic narrative around immigration every second week, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for example, by established parties, then of course this narrative gains more traction."

Need for Established Groups to Develop Their Distinct Discourses

The research emphasized the necessity for mainstream political parties to develop their distinct discourses, especially on subjects such as migration and assimilation, rather than constantly trailing after the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "If the conductor is radical and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be playing."